(Not) Getting Away with Canceling

On the other side of truth

When I started this blog, I had no idea how bad things would get. And for how long. And that now, even five years later, cancellation for criticizing the corona policy, hasn't come to an end. I had this gut feeling, relying on my experience of over 30 years as a medical journalist, that things might get messy. Through all times, scientists have fought nail and toe about their convictions.

When I started this blog, Facebook, Twitter, and alike made sure that my posts weren't shown anywhere. On every post or story I published, there were advertisements on top: how wonderfully this vaccine would work and that you should make an appointment for the jab rather sooner than later.

In the US, corona vaccination is still recommended for kids as small as six months of age. In Germany, many parents think that's a great idea, too. It is not.

Every organization of any stature – EMA, CDC, NIH, VAERS, PEI, RKI, to name only a few – has confirmed by now, in tiny little unavoidable portions, that what we had guessed, about all of the corona jab covering, was not only accurate. It was often even worse.

THE CULTURE WAR AROUND THE CORONA JAB CONTINUES

That's why I wear it like a badge of honor: that the first hospital group that just recently had welcomed us warmly to write about their specialists, now – for the first time since we've started medical journalism – has cancelled us. When we asked whether they would like us to publish their stories also on our homepages, the answer sounds like this: "After thoughtful consideration", they wrote to us, they discovered that they don't like our view and posts and blogs around the corona issue.

In this era of canceling other opinions, of not allowing science to be questioned, of trying to silence attempts of deeper investigation and research than saying "Yes, Sir" or "No, Sir", we 'll take the challenge. In a time and age, when even killing people for their opinions, beliefs, and attempts to debate them openly, the answer is highly welcomed. It is exactly this type of approach that is vividly proving the point we are trying to make. Nothing is carved in stone. Everybody can be wrong, we too. Together, we can find out who, for the sake of patients who doctors (should) serve, is right or not, and what's best. All of that ideally free from any pharmaceutical interests, and the bias that comes with it.

As a medical journalist for a weekly magazine, I once wrote a story when the new generation of opioids crashed the market of pain medication. They were declared "free from any harmful side effects". You take them, pain vanishes, and then you stop taking them. Boy, what a lie that was. They were the entrance door, these highly addictive opioids, to the Fentanyl crisis of these days.

There was a whole industry in the US built around those false claims, including the publication "Medical Tribune"– the gospel of objective medical journalism at that time. It stemmed from the pharmaceutical company who produced those Opioids: Purdue. Hundreds of thousands died already from those pills. Like today from the corona jabs.

"I am not against vaccination", Robert F. Kennedy jr. said in the US senate hearings, "I am pro science." Amen. I want to know, after decades of admitting vaccines unchecked to children. I want placebo controlled clinical studies whether there is something like mercury or aluminium or whatever in them that – in the wrong constellation of factors – has the potential to disable children forever. I just want to know.

In our family, we are all vaccinated against whatever. But two of us, my little grandson from MMR and me from the corona jab, nearly died. It was the easiest thing to test him on antibodies, and find out that he never needs MMR again, since his antibodies are rocket high – but he also can't have any other vaccination again because one more could perpetuate him into the horror show so many kids are going through. Every parent can have their child tested, at least before the second MMR shot.

And for me, it means lifelong medication with severe side effects… thanks to Pfizer.

WHAT DID ACTUALLY HAPPEN?

Why I stood on my toes in high alert in 2021 already, was a press conference of Pfizer's where the responsible marketing manager declared that Corminaty, their Covid-19-vaxx, was never meant as a vaccination, didn't protect against Covid, didn't prevent transmission, and it also wouldn't save people from dying through Covid. It was public. Everybody could see it, read it or listen to it. Among a lot of other red flags.

But what then, if not a vaccine? I thought. The question is still valid. What is it for?

Going back to the beginning, where the genetically manipulated Corona virus slipped from the lab in Wuhan, the most logic answer would be: Disarm the protein that had been manipulated, by calling forth antibodies against exactly that spike protein. But instead of disarming it, the so called "vaccines" accelerated its numbers, broke down barriers to the human brain and heart and natural cancer shields and reproductive organs, among others. And instead of disappearing after seven days, as promised, it multiplies in many vaccinated people until today, five years later. A health catastrophe is unraveling right in front of our eyes, because no one knows how to reverse that mechanism, how to catch the protein, and how to fence it in again.

And if you don't want to know more, dear cancelers: I do.